Built by engineers who'd rather show you the architecture.

PeppolBridge was founded on a straightforward observation: every e-invoicing mandate, in every country, creates the same bottleneck — and it isn't the Peppol stack. Access Points and service providers get their compliance infrastructure accredited and certified, and then hit the wall that actually decides their business: the long tail of client ERPs. SAP estates configured a decade ago, Tally installs in trading companies, AutoCount in Malaysian SMEs, custom systems nobody documents. Each one a "three-month integration project" — multiplied by every client in the pipeline, against a regulatory deadline that doesn't move.

We started in the UAE, where the Federal Tax Authority's mandate gave the problem a hard date. Rather than build another e-invoicing system — there are plenty — we built the layer everyone was missing: a connector platform with one canonical invoice model, five integration patterns that reach any ERP with zero schema changes and no inbound firewall ports, and country compliance packaged as versioned rule-packs.

The bet paid off in a way we only half-expected: because the hard part was country-agnostic, every new mandate became configuration instead of construction. Today the same platform emits PINT AE for the UAE, drives MyInvois clearance with PINT MY in Malaysia, and ships Peppol BIS 3.0 in Belgium — with Oman's profile in development for the August 2026 pilot and Qatar's tracked from draft law to specification.

We're headquartered in Gurugram, built by a team that treats compliance like a correctness problem and reliability like a feature. If you want to judge us, don't read this page — read the architecture and the API.